Reaction
Reaction time test
Tap as soon as the screen turns green.Click, or press the space bar, as soon as the screen turns green.
5 tries. It takes about one minute.
More options
About this reaction time test
This reaction time test measures how quickly you respond to something you see. You wait, the screen turns green, and you tap or click as fast as you can. The test times the gap in milliseconds, which are thousandths of a second. After 5 tries your middle time is your result, and we set it beside a published study of 1,469 adults[1]. It is free, there is no sign-up, and your result stays in your browser.
How the test works
- Press Start. The first try is for practice and does not count.
- Wait while the screen is blue. The wait is different every time, between 1.5 sec and 4.5 sec, so you cannot guess it.
- When the screen turns green, tap it, click, or press the space bar.
- If you press too early, that try does not count and you do it again.
- After 5 tries you see your result: the middle score of all of them.
What is a good reaction time?
In a study of 1,469 adults aged 18 to 65, the average time to answer a simple light was 230.8 ms[1]. Most people in that study were within 26.8 ms of the average, either way. Robot tests of everyday devices found that a screen, a browser and a keyboard add 44.1 ms to 115.1 ms more than the study's own equipment, and a touch screen 39.8 ms to 52 ms[2][3]. Your real time is probably that much quicker than the number you see, so we show where you stand as a range: for example, quicker than about 5 to 9 in 10 adults.
| What | Figure |
|---|---|
| Adults measured | 1,469 |
| Average reaction time | 230.8 ms |
| Spread (standard deviation) | 26.8 ms |
| Delay we allow for, with a keyboard or mouse | 44.1 ms to 115.1 ms |
| Delay we allow for, with a touch screen or pen | 39.8 ms to 52 ms |
| Year published | 2015 |
Human Benchmark, a popular website, reports a median of 273 ms (reported by the site)[4] over many millions of clicks. Its figure counts clicks rather than people, and it mixes every kind of phone, screen and mouse, so we show it as a mark on the ruler and never as a comparison. A good time, then, is one near your own best on the same device: the study tells you where adults stand, your history tells you whether you are getting quicker.
How we measure
The green screen is drawn at the start of a new picture on your screen, and the clock starts with that picture. Your time is taken from the moment the browser registered your tap, click or key, not from the moment our code got round to reading it. On a 60 Hz screen each picture stays for a sixtieth of a second, so the start of the green is known to within one picture.
A browser cannot see two delays: the time your screen needs to light up the green, and the time your touch screen, mouse or keyboard needs to report the press. Robots that pressed everyday computers and phones found that together they add 44.1 ms to 115.1 ms more than the study's own equipment with a keyboard, and 39.8 ms to 52 ms with a touch screen[2][3]. No study has timed a mouse this way, so a mouse gets the keyboard's figures, and a pen the touch screen's. Your real time is therefore quicker than the number you see, and that is why we compare you as a range and not as one exact number. On a computer the range is wide, because computers differ a lot: take it as a rough guide.
If you switch to another tab or app during a try, or the screen stalls while the green is showing, that try does not count and you do it again. Your result is saved in this browser and nowhere else: it never goes into a link, and it is never sent to us. You can read about us to see who makes the site.
Your screen and your device
- A wired mouse or a keyboard reports a press sooner than most wireless mice and touch screens.
- A 144 Hz screen shows the green sooner than a 60 Hz screen, because it draws a new picture more often.
- Other tabs and programs that keep the computer busy can delay the picture that shows the green.
None of these is a reason to worry about one result. They are the reason we always tell you how your result was taken, so that you compare like with like: a phone result with your earlier phone results, a mouse result with your mouse results.
Sleep, time of day and practice
A short night slows most people down more than anything else on this page. Reaction time is also a little slower early in the morning and late at night than in the middle of the day. Practice helps during the first few runs, while you learn the rhythm of the test, and then it levels off.
- Take the test on the same device each time.
- Take it at about the same time of day.
- Compare the middle time of several runs, not your single best try.
Age
Reaction time grows slowly with age. In the study above it rose a little with each year of age[1]. From one birthday to the next the change is far smaller than the difference between a good night and a bad one, or between two devices. A child is compared with adults here, because the study measured adults.
Guessing does not help
The wait before the green is chosen at random for every try, so there is no rhythm to learn. A press before the green is a false start, and a press that comes too soon after it to be a reaction is a guess: both are thrown away, and you do that try again. The quickest way to a good result is to watch the screen, keep your finger ready and react to the colour itself.
Questions
Is the reaction time test free?
Yes. There is no account, no sign-up and no email. Your results stay in this browser, and nobody else can see them.
Why do you give a range of adults and not one exact number?
Because your browser, your screen and your mouse, keyboard or touch screen add a delay that the page cannot see. We work out where you would stand with the least and with the most delay that robot tests of everyday devices found, and show both ends.
Why do you use the middle time and not the best one?
The best time is often a lucky press that happened to land just after the change. The middle time of several tries says how quickly you usually respond, and the study measured people in a similar way.
Why is my result slower on a phone?
A touch screen needs time to notice a tap and pass it on to the browser, and you hold a phone in your hand instead of resting a finger on a button. The delay differs from phone to phone, so compare phone results with phone results.
Can children take the test?
Yes. Keep in mind that the comparison is with adults, because the study measured adults only.
Does the test say anything about my health?
No. For information and self-reflection, not a medical or psychological assessment. If you are worried about a change in your reactions, talk to a doctor.
Sources
- Woods, D. L., Wyma, J. M., Yund, E. W., Herron, T. J., & Reed, B. (2015). Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 131.doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00131
n = 1,469; Community volunteers in Rotorua, New Zealand, aged 18 to 65 (mean age 45.8, 40% men) - Pronk, T., Wiers, R. W., Molenkamp, B., & Murre, J. (2020). Mental chronometry in the pocket? Timing accuracy of web applications on touchscreen and keyboard devices. Behavior Research Methods, 52(3), 1371–1382.doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01321-2
Four devices from 2015 and 2016: a MacBook Pro, an ASUS laptop, a Samsung Galaxy S7 and an iPhone 6S, pressed by a robotAbstract: "In controlled circumstances, as can be realized in a lab setting, very accurate stimulus timing and moderately accurate RT measurements could be achieved on both touchscreen and keyboard devices, though RTs were consistently overestimated." Table 4 "Descriptives of RT overestimations (in milliseconds) per device and browser" (OS, Web Browser, Minimum, Maximum, Mean, SD): "Android Chrome 46.0 103.5 69.8 7.4", "iOS Safari 48.3 96.3 57.6 6.5", "MacOS Safari 93.0 163.7 132.9 8.1", "Windows Chrome 64.7 70.6 68.5 1.7", "Windows Firefox 49.8 84.9 61.9 5.7".
( 2026-10-06: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC7280355/fullTextXML) - Anwyl-Irvine, A., Dalmaijer, E. S., Hodges, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2021). Realistic precision and accuracy of online experiment platforms, web browsers, and devices. Behavior Research Methods, 53(4), 1407–1425.doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01501-5
Desktop and laptop computers with Windows 10 and macOS, pressed by a robot; and the equipment of 202,600 online participantsAbstract: "We then employed a robot actuator in realistic set-ups to measure response recording across the aforementioned platforms, and between different keyboard types (desktop and integrated laptop)." "We found that modern web platforms provide reasonable accuracy and precision for display duration and manual response time". Table 2 "RT delay is calculated as the difference between known and recorded RT." Browser means: "Chrome 78.81", "Edge 80.10", "Firefox 82.30", "Safari 76.50"; device means: "macOS-Desktop 85.35", "Windows-Desktop 76.24", "Windows-Laptop 73.65". Results: "We found that 77% of these devices were desktop or laptop computers, whereas only 20% were mobile devices" "Based on a sample of 202,600 participants."
( 2026-10-06: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC8367876/fullTextXML) - Human Benchmark (2026). Reaction Time Statistics. humanbenchmark.com.https://humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/statistics
n = 81,000,000; Reaction-time clicks by visitors to the site: attempts, not people